Skip to main content
メニュー
Revvity logo
Contact us
JP
Revvity Sites Globally

Select your location.

*e-commerce not available for this region.

australia.webp Australia
austria.webp Austria
belgium.webp Belgium
brazil.webp Brazil *
canada.webp Canada
china.webp China *
denmark.webp Denmark
finland.webp Finland
france.webp France
germany.webp Germany
hong-kong.webp Hong Kong (China) *
india.webp India *
ireland.webp Ireland
italy.webp Italy
japan.webp Japan *
luxembourg.webp Luxembourg
mexico.webp Mexico *
netherlands.webp Netherlands
norway.webp Norway
philippines.webp Philippines *
republic of korea.webp Republic of Korea *
singapore.webp Singapore *
spain.webp Spain
sweden.webp Sweden
switzerland.webp Switzerland
thailand.webp Thailand *
uk.webp United Kingdom
usa.webp United States
Breadcrumb
...
  • ホーム
  • Resources
  • Knowledge Base
  • CellCountingSub Section
  • Comparing Manual and Automated Counting Methods
Cell Counting and Image Cytometry

Comparing Manual and Automated Counting Methods

Section
Cellometer Applications
Celigo Applications
Cell Counting Method Selection
Cell Counting and Image Cytometry FAQs
Cell-based Assays for Bioprocessing
Cell-based Assays for Gene Therapy Development
Cellometer Applications
Modern Virology Assays
Sub Section
Cell Counting with a Hemocytometer
Automated Analysis of Primary Cells
Brightfield Cell Analysis
Cell Analysis for Breweries and Biofuels
Cell Concentration and Viability for Blood-based Samples
Cell Counting with a Hemocytometer
Cell Viability for Clean and Messy Samples
Fluorescent Assays
Immuno-oncology Research Using Cellometer Instruments
Miscellaneous Cell Types
Topic
Comparing Manual and Automated Counting Methods
Comparing Manual and Automated Counting Methods
Counting Mammalian Cells Using a Hemocytometer
Counting Yeast Cells Using a Hemocytometer
History of the Hemocytometer
Sources of Hemocytometer Counting Errors
The Disposable Hemocytometer

Introduction

The Cellometer image cytometers are capable of performing automated concentration and viability measurement using both Trypan blue and fluorescent methods. The fluorescent Cellometer instruments, such as Auto 2000, K2 and Ascend, determine viability by counting cells stained with acridine orange (AO) and propidium iodide (PI). This allows for more reliable detection of nucleated cell in samples such as PBMCs and splenocytes that contain red blood cell contamination. The Cellometer Auto 2000 has been validated for reliability, reproducibility and linearity against manual counting using a hemocytometer following the recommended testing guidelines set by NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology).

Cellometer Auto 2000 reliability and precision

Reliability of the Cellometer Auto 2000 counting method was determined by comparing the calculated % CV of two individuals. (Hemocytometer and Auto 2000). The precision of the Cellometer Auto 2000 counting method was determined by comparing the calculated % CV intra (single) user (Auto 2000). The reliability and precision tests used 5 µm diameter beads at a concentration of 1.0 x 106 beads/mL. Two users performed 6 counts each of the beads with a hemocytometer and 12 counts each of the beads on the Cellometer Auto 2000 under same conditions. The results obtained from the Cellometer Auto 2000 were compared with the results from the hemocytometer. Coefficients of variation (%CV) between each counting method and between users were calculated. The % CV was 2.9% for the reliability of the Cellometer Auto 2000 with the hemocytometer and between two users. Precision of the Cellometer Auto 2000 was 4.6% and 3.5% for % CV intra user 1 and user 2 respectfully and an % CV inter user 1 & 2 of 1.8%
 

Hemocytometer Bead Concentration (x106beads/mL) % CV intra
User 1 average (n=6) 1.05 4.9%
User 2 average (n=6) 1.11 6.9%
User 1 & 2 average (n=12) 1.08  
STDEV User 1 & 2 0.043  
%CV inter Uswer 1 & 2 4.0%  

 

Hemocytometer Bead Concentraion (x106beads/mL) % CV intra
Auto 2000 Bead Concentration (x106beads/mL) % CV intra
User 1 average (n=12) 1.01 4.6%
User 2 average (n=12) 1.04 3.5%
User 1 & 2 average (n=24) 1.03  
STDEV User 1 & 2 0.019  
%CV inter User 1 & 2 1.8%  
Hemocytometer & Auto 2000 Bead Concentration x106beads/mL) %CV intra
User 1 average (Hem & A2K) 1.03 2.4%
User 2 average (Hem & A2K) 1.08 3.5%
User 1 & 2 average (n=24) 1.05  
STDEV User 1 & 2 0.031  
%CV inter User 1 & 2 2.9%  

 

Cellometer Auto 2000 linearity

Following the guidelines published by NIST, linearity of the Auto 2000 was performed by measuring different Jurkat cell concentrations, plotted on a graph with expected cell concentrations compared with the measured cell concentrations. R2 value for the measure cell concentrations was >0.999 and the error bars overlaid with the expected cell concentration line.

Auto 2000 Serial dilution Jurkat cell concentrations
 

Auto-2000-serial-dilution-Jurkat-cell-concentrations


Error bars: +/- standard deviation for each average measured cell concentration
 

Dilution Expected Conc. Measured Conc. STDEV %CV
1 1.06E+07 1.06E+07 1.85E+05 1.8%
0.5 5.29E+06 5.50E+06 9.25E+04 1.7%
0.25 2.65E+06 2.69E+06 1.20E+05 4.5%
0.125 1.32E+06 1.28E+06 2.74E+04 2.1%
0.0625 6.61E+05 5.59E+05 3.78E+04 6.8%
0.03125 3.31E+05 2.79E+05 2.68E+04 9.6%
0.015625 1.65E+05 1.24E+05 1.21E+04 9.8%



For research use only. Not for use in diagnostic procedures.

ON THIS PAGE
Revvity Logo

©2025 Revvity - All rights reserved

Revvity is a trademark of Revvity, Inc. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.